Skip to content
For underwriting teams

A structured governance-evidence feed for your AI supplemental questionnaires.

Oathmark scores, monitors, and packages AI governance evidence for professional-services firms — the same firms your teams are underwriting right now. Every Oathmark customer on the Continuous Monitor produces a dated, self-reported governance record in a format your teams can consume without back-and-forth; attorney-signed reports are available for Attorney-Led engagements, which are delivered by an independent law firm under a separate engagement letter (Oathmark is a legal-technology company and does not itself practice law).

legal@oathmark.ai · carriers@oathmark.ai

The partnership

A data-and-referral partnership. No cash between us.

Patterned on how cyber carriers already partner with security posture platforms (SecurityScorecard, BitSight, Vanta). We share underwriting-grade evidence with your team; you share Oathmark with the firms whose renewal supplementals we already answer.

What we provide

  • Structured, dated governance record for every firm on Continuous Monitor (self-reported, built from live Monitor data)
  • Approved-tool list with vendor DPA status
  • Per-employee training completion records
  • Documented incident-response plans
  • Vendor risk assessments per AI tool
  • Machine-readable format your underwriting platforms can ingest

What you provide

  • Acceptance of Oathmark’s governance record as underwriting evidence
  • Referral to Oathmark in your renewal supplemental questionnaires
  • Optional: co-marketing at industry events (RIMS, ABA TECHSHOW, PLI)
  • Optional: introduction to your business-development team for policyholder outreach

What neither party pays

  • No cash payments between our organizations
  • No revenue share on subscriptions
  • No exclusive-vendor arrangements
  • No commission structures
  • Structure follows established cyber-posture partnership patterns
Who we partner with

Cyber, E&O, and malpractice carriers underwriting professional-services firms.

Cyber carriers writing coverage for law firms, accounting firms, registered investment advisers and broker-dealers, and insurance agencies of 10 to 500 people. Your AI supplemental questionnaires are asking questions Oathmark customers already answer with a dated, self-reported governance record built from live Monitor data.

E&O and malpractice carriers writing professional liability for the same firms. AI-adjacent claims are on the rise; underwriting visibility hasn't caught up. Oathmark closes that gap.

Larger commercial carriers evaluating AI governance as an emerging underwriting factor. If your team is building the AI-supplemental question set for 2027 renewals, we'd like to be part of that conversation.

Diligence material

Materials your team can pressure-test.

  • Technical specification of the governance-record format
  • Sample dated governance record (real customer, anonymized)
  • Data collection and retention policy
  • Incident response and disclosure procedure
  • Sample attorney engagement letter (for attorney-delivered tiers)
  • Insurance underwriting benchmark: comparison of the AI-specific questions our customers can already answer vs. typical 2026 supplementals
Request the diligence packet
Next step

A 30-minute call with your underwriting or BD lead.

We share the technical spec; you share the current AI supplemental for one of your books. If there's alignment, we build a formal partnership from there. If not, we've each learned something useful. Either way, no long meetings.